這段改編自 2010 年 4 月 24 日的對話。

.

…

我在之前的工作，訓練了表達技巧。我在中學教書時，需要每天講學三個多小時。講了一年半載後，說話才通順，可以完成完整句子而不「跳線」。

之後，我說話時就好像，口部自己有思想，內容自己有舖排，而毋須經過大腦的思考。

要鍊成這個「說話內容思路大致清晰」，唯有靠大規模的練習。

.

第二，要本身是很熱愛講授知識，才會願意花，那極超大量的心思時間，作那大規摸的練習。所以，更核心的要點是，自己如果不熱愛，就不要從事這行業。

.

第三，則是「每一節課應該只有一個重點」的補充。

If your product is Great, it doesn’t need to be Good.

…

By focusing on only a few core features in the first version, you are forced to find the true essence and value of the product.

…

Making the iPad successful is Apple’s problem though, not yours. If you’re creating a new product, what are the three (or fewer) key features that will make it so great that you can cut or half-ass everything else? Are you focusing at least 80% of your effort on getting those three things right?

Disclaimer: This advice probably only applies to consumer products (ones where the purchaser is also the user — this includes some business products). For markets that have purchasing processes with long lists of feature requirements, you should probably just crank out as many features as possible and not waste time on simplicity or usability.

— If your product is Great, it doesn’t need to be Good.

— Paul Buchheit

那是 Paul Buchheit 講過的，我現在轉述成：

在第一個版本中，最重要賣點以外的優點，都只是雜音。

這個原理翻譯成教學版本的話，就是：

在教授新課題時，應只聚焦核心思想，用不同的字眼言辭去覆術它，而斬釘截鐵地，省略其他一切細節，暫時。

主題以外的有趣內容，一律視為敵人，暫時。

— Me@2023.01.27 07:46:40 PM

.

.

2023.01.28 Saturday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK