…
He can deduce the relative velocity by the separations
and
. However, he still cannot deduce
nor
unless he is able to look outside the car window. Thus, he cannot deduce the car speed
just by observing the positions and velocities of the objects inside the car.
.
For simplicity, assume object 1 is actually a point of the car itself. So is actually the speed of the car,
. Then the calculation
becomes
where is a point of the car.
In this case, becomes the position of object 2 relative to car; and
becomes the velocity of object 2 relative to the car. The equation can be simplified to
.
If the car has acceleration, the story is totally different. In short, for the observer inside the car, the path of each particle is not a straight line anymore. In long, the previous calculation becomes
where is the acceleration of the car. Here, we assume that
and
are all pointing in the same direction.
Although the result is the same as before:
the velocity is no longer a constant; it would keep decreasing.
In the no acceleration case, even if the particle velocity and the car velocity are not in parallel, the observer will see a straight path. However, in the accelerated case where the acceleration and velocity directions are not in parallel, the path of the particle will no longer be a straight line.
That is what “acceleration is absolute” means. The observer can notice different phenomena, compared with the no-acceleration case, even without seeing outside the car window.
The additional meaning of “acceleration is absolute” is that we deduce the acceleration value by measuring ,
, and
. And, unlike velocity values, this acceleration value is identical for any two observers related by a Galilean transformation. (They are called inertial observers.)
— Me@2023-12-06 11:06:23 AM
.
.
2023.12.16 Saturday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK