Ex 1.32 Path functions and state functions, 2.1

Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics

.

1. The local-tuple function f is the same as the local-tuple function \bar \Gamma (\bar f) where \bar f[q] = f \circ \Gamma [q].

2. …

~~~

1. Equation

\displaystyle{\begin{aligned} \bar f &= f \circ \Gamma \\ \end{aligned}}

is the definition of \bar f. And equation

\displaystyle{\begin{aligned} f &= \bar \Gamma (\bar f) \\ \end{aligned}}

is the definition of \bar \Gamma. So, in theory,

\displaystyle{\begin{aligned} f &= \bar \Gamma (\bar f) \\ \end{aligned}}

is just true by definition.

In practice, their initial inputs are both the same local tuple

\displaystyle{\begin{aligned} &(t, q(t), v(t), \cdots, q^{(n)}(t)) \\ \end{aligned}},

which has only a finite number of components. The path q in the process is generated by that initial input:

\displaystyle{\mathcal{O} (t,q,v, \cdots, q^{(n)})}

So the function \Gamma would get you back the exact local tuple from the osculating path:

\displaystyle{(t,q,v,\cdots, q^{(n)}) = \Gamma[\mathcal{O} (t,q,v, \cdots, q^{(n)}](t)}

.

In other words, since for the functions \displaystyle{f} and \displaystyle{\bar \Gamma (\bar f)}, neither input is the path itself, the identity is exact.

Conceptually,

(define (f local)
  (g local)) 
 
(define ((Gamma-bar f-bar) local)
  ((f-bar (osculating-path local)) (time local))) 

(define ((f-bar q) t)
  (f ((Gamma q) t))
 
;; (((f-bar q) 't)
;; == f((Gamma q) 't)
;; == f('t, (v 't), (a 't),...) 

— Me@2024-10-16 10:34:35 AM

.

.

2024.11.04 Monday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK