Even in this stranger case, all experimental results are still consistent with special relativity (aka causality), because wave functions are not physical quantities. Instead, they are mathematical quantities for calculating probabilities, which themselves are also mathematical quantities, for predicting experimental results.
~ define the microscopic events in terms of observable physical phenomena such as the change of readings of the measuring device
defineunobservable events in terms of observable events
— Me@2022-01-31 08:33:01 AM
(Me@2022-02-17 03:34:27 PM: I think I have the answer now. I plan to publish it soon. But I keep the following as a record of thoughts.)
A further strangeness is that
~ How come the results are always consistent when the EPR pair has no definite states before
measurement the activation of at least one detector?
~ How does the universe to do such bookkeeping for a system exists across several light-years when the physical variables are still in superposition when the pair is emitted from the source?
~ … when the difference of possible values (such as the difference of spin-up and spin-down) still have no physical definition yet?
~ … when the difference of possible values have not yet defined by the difference of possible readings of a detector (before any detector is allowed to be installed-and-activated)
However, this kind of strangeness also happens in classical physics, for example:
1. How come energy is always conserved? How is energy conservation “executed”?
2. How does probability work? How does the universe work to fulfill the predicted probability patterns?
— Me@2022-02-11 12:47:14 AM
A clue (but not yet the whole final solution) is that probability is with respect to observers.
— Me@2022-02-11 10:13:36 AM
A probability is partially objective and partially subjective. So a wave function, which is used for calculating probabilities, is also partially objective and partially subjective.
A major fault of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is that it uses an unnecessarily complicated language to state an almost common sense fact that any probability value is partially subjective and thus must be with respect to an observer.
— Me@2022-02-14 10:36:52 AM
— Me@2022-02-14 10:35:27 AM
2022.02.17 Thursday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK