網絡記憶 1.3

融會貫通 | 故事連線 3

這段改篇自 2010 年 4 月 30 日的對話。

我的意思是,你千萬不要「死記」。「死記」的不好處是,一方面你心裡會很不舒服;另一方面,你很容易會遺忘。

(CSK:但是,你剛才又叫我們不要期望可以自己想出那些數學技巧,而一定要在考試前背誦好。現在,你又叫我們不要背誦?)

我剛才是叫你不要「死記」,而不是叫你不要「記」。「死記」的意思是,在沒有任何理解之下,就把那些東西生硬背誦下來。只要精神狀態稍為波動,所有「死記」的東西就會不見了。

那樣,如何可以「生記」呢?

先理解那些公式背後的 幾何意義 或者 物理意思,然後把上文下理一併背誦下來。例如,如果你有 4 樣東西 —— A、B、C、D —— 要記的話,其實你有超過 4 樣東西要記。除了要各自記得 A、B、C、D 以外,你還要記得它們之間的關係,例如:

1. A

2. B

3. C

4. D

5. AB (原來 B 是由 A 推算出來的。)

6. BC (原來 B 和 C 只不過是同一個意思的不同講法。)

7. AD (原來 D 只是 A 的一個特例。)

8. CD (原來 D 可以用來驗算 C 的運算結果。)

9. etc.

那樣,A、B、C、D 對你來說,除了是 4 樣東西以外,還形成了一個知識網絡。

萬一你遺忘了(例如)A 的話,你可以立刻由 B、C、D 把 A 推斷出來,因為在這一個知識網絡中,你有遠多於一條路可以走到 A,亦即是你有遠多於一個方法回憶到 A。即使你不能直接回憶到 A,你仍可以由 B 去 A,又可以由 C 去 A,等等。只要其中一條路行得通,你就可以到達 A。反而,要遺忘 A 的話,你需要一個奇蹟。

— Me@2011.03.31

2011.03.31 Thursday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

M-theory and Loop Quantum Gravity

The odd thing is that there are a lot of mathematical connections between string theory and the loop representation. Gradually, as time went on, I became more and more convinced that maybe the layfolk were right – maybe the loop representation of quantum gravity really WAS string theory in disguise, or vice versa. This made a little embarrassed by how much I had been making fun of string theory.

I decided to write a paper about this, and as I did some research I was intrigued to find more and more connections between the two approaches, to the point where it is clear that while they are presently very distinct, they come from the same root, historically speaking.

So what I’m hinting at, in brief, is that a bunch of category theory may provide the links between modern string theory with its conformal fields and the loop representation of quantum gravity. This is not as outre as it may appear. The categories being discussed here are really just ways of talking about symmetries (see my stuff on categories and symmetries for more on this). As usual in physics, the clearest way to grasp the connection between two seemingly disparate problems is often by recognizing that they have the same symmetries.

September 11, 1993
This Week’s Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 18)
John Baez

2011.03.31 Thursday ACHK

PayPal

.

No, because I think we didn’t know what we were doing. I think the hallmark of a really good entrepreneur is that you’re not really going to build one specific company. The goal — at least the way I think about entrepreneurship — is you realize one day that you can’t really work for anyone else. You have to start your own thing.

— Max Levchin

— Founders at Work

.

.

.

2011.03.31 Thursday ACHK