The 4 bugs of quantum mechanics popular

The “para” in “paradox” means “meta”. The original meaning of the word “paradox” is

an error due to mixing language levels—-the object level and the meta level.

However, people have misused the word “paradox” a lot, using it to label anything unexpected. For example, in quantum mechanics, there are many so-called “paradoxes” that may be not really paradoxes.

However, among those quantum mechanics “paradoxes”, some of them are really paradoxes, whose existences are really due to mixing the object time level and the meta-time level.

The time within a story is called the “object time”. The time of the story’s writer or reader is called the “meta-time”.

The physical time in which an experiment is conducted is the object time. The time in which an experiment is designed is the meta-time. The meta-time of an experiment is its designer’s time level.

.

“Wave function collapse” is not a physical process. Instead, it is mathematical. It just means that we have to replace the wave function with another if we replace the system with another.

In other words, it is not a physical event that happens during the operation of the experiment. Instead, it “happens” when you replace one experiment design with another. In this sense, “wave function collapse” happens not in the experiment’s time, but in the experiment’s meta-time, the time level of the experiment designer.

wave function collapse

~ probability distribution change (replacement) due to replacing “the experiment without measurement device” with “the experiment with measuring device“ (for a particular physical variable)

.

The common quantum mechanics “paradoxes” are induced by 4 main misunderstandings.

1.  A wave function is of a particle. Wrong.

Instead, it is of the system (the experiment setup). It is of a variable of the physical system.

Actually, a system has more than one wave functions. Each physical variable of that system has its own wave function.

2.1  A system's wave function exists in physical spacetime. Wrong.

Instead, the wave function exists in the mathematical abstract space. With respect to an individual physical variable, different physical systems give different probability distributions, which are encoded in different wave functions.

So a wave function (for a particular variable) is an intrinsic property of a system. It is a mathematical property, not a physical state, of the physical system (the experimental setup). It does not evolve in time.

In a sense, you cannot change a wave function; you can only replace it with another by replacing the physical system with another.

— Me@2022-02-19 04:21:38 PM

.

.

2022.02.19 Saturday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

天線化磁石

這段改編自 2010 年 10 月 14 日的對話。

.

今年三月時,我和一位朋友,想為這個原理,起一個簡潔的名字,因為沒有的話,每次要提起它時,也十分麻煩。

一個可能可用的名字是「天線原理」。

.

例如,如果要「搞 gag」(弄笑話)的話,不刻意去弄,就不會有笑話。但是,如果刻意去弄的話,又只會弄到冷笑話。那怎樣辦呢?

那就唯有要,開著「靈感天線」,將自己的心理狀態,調節到適當的天界頻道,企圖去接收,來自未來的訊息。有時接收得到,有時接收不到,不可強求。

你在作其他事情時,就有時會接收到。相反,如果不作他事,專心弄笑話的話,大概可以保證,一定接收不到。

弄巧反拙,寧拙無巧。創意呢家嘢,可遇不可求——沒法勇敢爭取,只能大方接收。

然後,你可以試試,把這個結構,改編成愛情的版本。

.

例如,如果要愛情的話,不刻意去找,就不會有對象。但是,如果刻意去找的話,又只會令到自己的行為舉止,十分唐突,令人厭惡。那怎樣辦呢?

那就唯有要,開著「愛情天線」,將自己的心理狀態,調節到適當的天界頻道,企圖去接收,來自未來的緣份。有時接收得到,有時接收不到,不可強求。

你在作其他事情時,就有時會接收到。

不斷作有意義的事情,就自然創造到,內在緣份和外在緣份。

.

內在緣份,即是一個不斷升級的自己。記住,你是你另一半的另一半。

升級了的自己,即是一個嶄新的世界。記住,一人一世界。

現在,你只是世界中的一人,但是將來,你這一人卻會化身成,你另一半的幾乎全部世界。

.

外在緣份,就是一個相遇的巧合,相戀的機會。

愛情在於吸引,不在追求。

愛情,在於雙方吸引,不在單向追求。

愛情,在於雙方魅力的互相吸引,不在一方企圖的單向追求。

愛情本應為,兩塊磁石的運作。要麼相吸,要麼相斥,沒有第三個可能。

「失戀」這術語,有如「第二次初戀」,都是自相矛盾的詞匯。

失,是單向;戀,是雙向。

相反,如果不作他事,專心找愛情的話,大概可以保證,一定接收不到。

「專心找愛情」會令你完美地消滅,內在姻和外在緣。

弄巧反拙,寧拙無巧。緣份呢家嘢,可遇不可求——沒法勇敢爭取,只能大方接收。

— Me@2022-02-19 06:34:31 AM

.

.

2022.02.19 Saturday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK