Marriage

Process, not a state, 8

.

Marriage is not a single event. Marriage is a lifelong process.

“Married” is not a state, but a process.

— Me@2010.12.24

.

.

2013.03.02 Saturday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

生疏荒廢

石頭永固 2 || use it or lose it || 不進則退 不用即棄

.

人的腦海之中,有一個「機會成本評價系統」,會自動刪除「沒有用」的才能,以節省記憶和時間資源。

「沒有用」既可以指「本身沒有用」,又可以指「本身有用 但不拿出來用」。對於「機會成本評價系統」而言,兩者沒有分別。

才幹以外,感情亦然。

— Me@2013-01-14 10:52:13 AM

.

.

2013.01.14 Monday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

The War of the Worlds

Animal Rights activist David McKnight, writing in the November 2004 issue of Human and Animal Rights, noted that at least five vegetarians and animal rights activists known to him personally were substantially influenced to take their stance by reading Wells’ book, which vividly conveys human beings’ horror at becoming in effect the Martians’ food animals. He surmises that many other people may have been similarly affected, though it might not have been Wells’ intention to propagate vegetarianism. In many passages, an explicit comparison is drawn between the Martians’ treatment of humans and the humans’ own treatment of cows, rabbits, rats, ants and other creatures which mankind in one way or another treads underfoot.

— Wikipedia on The War of the Worlds

— 22:33, 18 July 2006

.

.

2012.12.10 Monday ACHK

Move on

Yes, this city needs Bruce Wayne. Your resources, your knowledge… not your body. Not your life. That time has passed.

Remember when you left Gotham? Before all this, before Batman? You were gone seven years. Seven years I waited, hoping that you wouldn’t come back. Every year, I took a holiday. I went to Florence, there’s this cafe, on the banks of the Arno. Every fine evening, I’d sit there and order a Fernet Branca. I had this fantasy, that I would look across the tables and I’d see you there, with a wife and maybe a couple of kids. You wouldn’t say anything to me, nor me to you. But we’d both know that you’d made it, that you were happy. I never wanted you to come back to Gotham. I always knew there was nothing here for you, except pain and tragedy. And I wanted something more for you than that. I still do.

Alfred Pennyworth: I’ll get this to Mr. Fox, but no more. I’ve sewn you up, I’ve set your bones, but I won’t bury you. I’ve buried enough members of the Wayne family.

Bruce Wayne: You’ll leave me?

Alfred Pennyworth: You see only one end to your journey. Leaving is all I have to make you understand, you’re not Batman anymore. You have to find another way. You used to talk about finishing a life beyond that awful cape.

— The Dark Knight Rises

.

.

2012.12.08 Saturday ACHK

機會率悲劇 1.2

Monty Hall problem 1.2

這段改編自 2010 年 4 月 3 日的對話。

.

「機會均等假設」如果胡亂使用,會得到很多荒唐的結論。例如,小明跟媽媽說:「在這次考試,我的成績有兩個可能。要麼我考到全班第一,要麼我考不到全班第一。所以,今次我有一半的機會,考到全班第一。」

媽媽回答:「荒謬!」

小明再解釋:「『考到全班第一』和『考不到全班第一』已經窮盡了,這次考試結果的所有可能。你不會想像到,有第三個情況出現。」

那樣,小明的媽媽,應該如何反駁他呢?

只有兩個可能的結果,並不代表各自的機會率是二分之一。除非題目假設,又或者有以往的實驗數據支持,例如小明在以往的考試中,平次每兩次中,就會有一次考第一;否則,你不能自己假設,機會率會平均分配於各個可能性。

而這個「故亂假設機會均等」的思考錯誤,往往形成塵世間很多悲劇,例如選錯配偶和選錯事業。「我加入這一行,要麼成功,要麼失敗。所以,我成功的機會有一半。」那即使不是顯意識的思考,大概也會是潛意識的想法。

這個錯誤來自,不必要地選擇無知。正當的做法是,先做功課,先做好資料搜集。以自己當時可以得到,最多和最準確的資訊,去評價自己,加入某一行時,成功和失敗的機會率,各佔多少。即使那個機會率不會十分詳細,例如「成功的機會是 57%」,你也至少要有個大概,知道成功的機會較大,還是失敗。如果成功的機會較大,是約略大多少呢?是不是大到,值得你投資未來五年的人生,去作嘗試呢?

雖然,那也不保證一定成功,但是至起碼,即使錯了,也可以問心無愧。而且,如果你是在做足功課的情況下失敗,你吸收到的知識經驗,將會是最豐富的。那將大大提高你,未來成功的機會率。

— Me@2012.11.19

.

.

2012.11.19 Monday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

見仁見智

談情以外,還要談仁談智,愛情方會長久。

如果在對方身上,見不到仁,或者見不到智,愛情較難維持。

— Me@2012-10-27 10:38:16 AM

.

.

2012.10.28 Sunday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

Perfect Ending

The problem of a perfect result is, there is no future, there is no next step. The story cannot continue.

「完美結果」的壞處是,沒有未來,沒有下一步。故事無法繼續。

— Me@2012.10.25

.

.

2012.10.26 Friday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

Mirror selves, 2

說到底,愛情就是一個人的自我價值,在別人身上的反映。

– 愛默生

.

After all, the desire for love is the desire for a lifelong intellectual partner.

— Me@2012-10-11 12:29:17 AM

.

.

2012.10.14 Sunday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

The One

The difficulty is that the probability is so low. The easiness is that the pool is so large, and you only have to find one.

— Me@2011.11.17

.

.

2012.10.07 Sunday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

Memory 4.2

Copy Me, 5

這段改編自 2010 年 4 月 3 日的對話。

.

怎樣才為之「同一個人」,或者「同一個自我」呢?

洛克(John Locke)的標準是,有同一個記憶,就為之同一個自我。

但是,即使是同一個人的記憶,又會隨時間 變形、增刪、篡改。如果用洛克的標準,我們平時所講「同一個人」之中的「同一」,只是幻覺。即使是「同一」個人,其實「自我」亦在不斷變化之中。例如,「十年前的我」和「現在的我」,並不是完全相同的「同一個人」。

— Me@2012.10.01

.

.

2012.10.01 Monday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK