未來禮物
to create = to receive the gifts from the future
創造 = 接收來自未來的禮物
— Me@2010.11.28
2011.10.04 Tuesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
未來禮物
to create = to receive the gifts from the future
創造 = 接收來自未來的禮物
— Me@2010.11.28
2011.10.04 Tuesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
If your life gets better and better, you will not miss the past.
時常緬懷過去,代表你的生活情況越來越差。
— Me@2011.09.25
2011.09.28 Wednesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
His burning passion was to help the world stop wasting his time.
— I’m Feeling Lucky, p. xiii
— Douglas Edwards
2011.09.25 Sunday ACHK
緣份 4
Life is a lot of problems.
You are the solutions.
— Me@2011.09.19
2011.09.19 Monday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
6.3.2 Quantum Mechanics
6.4.1 Create: Teach
6.4.2 Create: Write
— Me@2010.11.27
2011.09.16 Friday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Verification principle
Verificationism is the view that a statement or question is only legitimate if there is some way to determine whether the statement is true or false, or what the answer to the question is.
Verification principle: That meaningful statements should be analytic, verifiable or falsifiable.
— Wikipedia on Verificationism
檢證原則
一句句子要有意思,你要講得出,至少在原則上,它在什麼情況下為之真、在什麼情況下為之假。換句話說,你要講得出,至少在原則上,如何證明或者否證它。否則,那句句子就沒有意義。
檢證原則 –> 印證原則
但是,有時即使一些句子明明是有意義的,在原則上,也沒有可能百分百證明,它們是正確的。
例如,科學理論句子的特性是,只要有一個妥當執行的實驗,和它的預測不相符,就足以否證它。相反,無論有多少次實驗的結果,和該個科學理論的預測吻合,你也不能保證,下一次的實驗結果,仍然會是那樣。換句話說,無論你做多少次實驗,也不能百分百證明,那句科學理論句子是正確的。
所以,我們放寬了「檢證原則」的要求,把它改編為「印證原則」。一句句子即使不能通過「檢證原則」,如何能夠通過「印證原則」的話,我們仍然可以視之為有意義。
印證原則
一句句子即使不能通過「檢證原則」,如果你可以講得出,至少在原則上,如何提高它的可信度,我們仍然可以視之為有意義。
— Me@2011.09.15
2011.09.15 Thursday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Write every draft as if it were your final draft …
— How to Write, Publish, and Sell Your Own How-To Book
– John T Reed
2011.09.11 Sunday ACHK
Here’s to the Crazy Ones.
The misfits.
The rebels.
The troublemakers.
The round pegs in the square holes.
The ones who see things differently.
They’re not fond of rules.
And they have no respect for the status quo.
You can quote them, disagree with them,
disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them.
About the only thing that you can’t do, is ignore them.
Because they change things.
They invent. They imagine. They heal.
They explore. They create. They inspire.
They push the human race forward.
Maybe they have to be crazy.
How else can you stare at an empty canvas and see a work of art?
Or, sit in silence and hear a song that hasn’t been written?
Or, gaze at a red planet and see a laboratory on wheels?
We make tools for these kinds of people.
While some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius.
Because the ones who are crazy enough to think that they can change the world,
are the ones who do.
— Think Different
— Apple
2011.09.07 Wednesday ACHK
與其期望世界沒有電腦病毒,倒不如自己安裝防毒程式。
— Me@2010.11.23
2011.08.31 Wednesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
年年齡 3.1.2
If the time rate is kept constant, the increasing rate is kept decreasing.
— Me@2011.08.25
For example, assume that my initial salary is HK$10,000 per month, and the increasing rate is HK$1,000 per month.
Then my salaries are
10,000 –> 11,000 –> 12,000 –> 13,000 –> 14,000 –> …
The corresponding increasing rates, in terms of percentage, are
10% –> 9.09% –> 8.33% –> 7.69% –> …
— Me@2011.08.30
2011.08.30 Tuesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
隨行不隨心 4
化名為實
= 盜用未來身份
— Me@2010.11.27
Feelings follow actions
= 盜用未來心情
— Me@2011.08.20
2011.08.21 Sunday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
.
People see people as what they are and ask “Why?”
I see people as what they can be and ask “Why not?”
.
– George Bernard Shaw
– modified by Robert F. Kennedy
.
– modified by Me
.
.
.
2008.05.06 Tuesday ACHK
Now = transcend time
Here = transcend self = self de-centralization
I = Be a miracle | 一切是創造
— Me@2010.11.25
— Me@2011.08.15
2011.08.15 Monday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
有所作為
The difference that makes no difference makes no difference.
—
無關痛癢的分別,毋須理會;
無關痛癢的改變,不作也罷。
— Me@2011.08.14
2011.08.14 Sunday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
If there is no solution, create one.
— Me@2010.11.24
2011.08.11 Thursday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
事件實在論 | Cumulative concept of time, 7
Event realism is due to
the past the necessary condition for the present, which is due to
1. events are changes of states, and
2. present = the summation of all past events.
— Me@2011.07.06
— Me@2011.08.01
2011.08.01 Monday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
世界上,竟然有動物可以長生不死:
燈塔水母:成熟的個體經過收縮觸手、外傘反轉、體型縮小等步驟,能夠重新在物體上著生,成為水螅體。能夠反轉生活史的這種能力在動物界極為稀有,也讓燈塔水母免於老死。 — 維基百科
2011.07.28 Thursday ACHK
人生到了三十歲,就進入了倒數階段。
— 改編自楊千嬅
2011.07.07 Thursday ACHK
這段改編自 2010 年 5 月 12 日的對話。
聽下去好像很神奇,怎可能做到「數百頁中的每一頁也記得」呢?
只要你跟著以下的步驟便行。
首先,你要準備一本筆記簿。然後,把教科書逐頁閱讀。閱讀每一頁時,你問問自己,該頁的課文,有什麼是「有機會不記得」而又「有需要記得」的呢?
例如,看看這一頁。第一段文字內容,有沒有需要記得的地方?
(CPK:有。)
那樣,你有可能忘記嗎?
(CPK:沒有。)
那你就毋須記錄任何東西,於你的筆記簿中。
再看下一段 …
…
如此類推。
現在,你發現這一頁的內容中,需要寫於筆記簿的東西,只有這一句。換句話說,你已將一頁的內容,壓縮成一句。你可以想像,用同樣的方法,你可以將這裡 300 頁的內容,歸納成(例如)200 頁的筆記。
到第二次溫習時,你就不需要再由頭閱讀這本 300 頁的教科書,而是改為背誦你那 200 頁的筆記。但是,因為你第二次溫習時,會事隔(例如)一個多月,不少內容會已經純熟了很多。「新知識」變成了「舊東西」,你再不可能不記得了。所以,那 200 頁的背誦內容中,凡是「一定會記得」的東西,你可以從筆記簿中刪除。透過這個方法,你可以把你的筆記再壓縮歸納成(例如)100 頁。
到第三次溫習時,你再把筆記再壓縮歸納成(例如)50 頁,如此類推。
如果你不斷重複歸納壓縮的話,到你真正公開試之前的一日時,你會只餘下(例如)20 頁的筆記。最後,你要保證自己對那 20 頁,有「全像記憶」:分毫不差,過目不忘。
你先試試用我這個溫習方法。如果你不用的話,通常會有一個典型劇情會發生:
…
— Me@2011.07.04
2011.07.04 Monday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
An old young man, will be a young old man.
– Benjamin Franklin
— Me@2010.11.25
2011.07.01 Friday ACHK
You must be logged in to post a comment.