EPR paradox, 11.7

Even in this stranger case, all experimental results are still consistent with special relativity (aka causality), because wave functions are not physical quantities. Instead, they are mathematical quantities for calculating probabilities, which themselves are also mathematical quantities, for predicting experimental results.

physical definition

~ define the microscopic events in terms of observable physical phenomena such as the change of readings of the measuring device

~ define unobservable events in terms of observable events

— Me@2022-01-31 08:33:01 AM

(Me@2022-02-17 03:34:27 PM: I think I have the answer now. I plan to publish it soon. But I keep the following as a record of thoughts.)

A further strangeness is that

~ How come the results are always consistent when the EPR pair has no definite states before measurement the activation of at least one detector?

~ How does the universe to do such bookkeeping for a system exists across several light-years when the physical variables are still in superposition when the pair is emitted from the source?

~ … when the difference of possible values (such as the difference of spin-up and spin-down) still have no physical definition yet?

~ … when the difference of possible values have not yet defined by the difference of possible readings of a detector (before any detector is allowed to be installed-and-activated)

.

However, this kind of strangeness also happens in classical physics, for example:

1. How come energy is always conserved? How is energy conservation “executed”?

2. How does probability work? How does the universe work to fulfill the predicted probability patterns?

— Me@2022-02-11 12:47:14 AM

.

A clue (but not yet the whole final solution) is that probability is with respect to observers.

— Me@2022-02-11 10:13:36 AM

A probability is partially objective and partially subjective. So a wave function, which is used for calculating probabilities, is also partially objective and partially subjective.

A major fault of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is that it uses an unnecessarily complicated language to state an almost common sense fact that any probability value is partially subjective and thus must be with respect to an observer.

— Me@2022-02-14 10:36:52 AM

— Me@2022-02-14 10:35:27 AM

.

.

2022.02.17 Thursday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

Job: Security, 2

Ask HN: What was the best decision you made in your career?

DerekQ on Sept 26, 2018 | next [–]

Moving from permanent to contractor.

I made the jump 5 years ago and have worked for a number of companies since, on 6-12 month contracts. The money has jumped each time, such that I’m on what I consider to be silly money now for the job I do — Ireland, not US.

The work is always interesting for at least 6 months and I learn a ton of new stuff with every contract, much of which I use when building my own products (Downtime between contracts).

Every aspect of contracting is better than being permanent: the ability to jump ship quickly without affecting my hireability, the exposure to so many different technologies and different ways of doing things, the constant freshness of new things and new people, the ideas that come with seeing how different teams create and build different software, the ease with which you can step into new contracts (often one 30 minute interview as opposed to multipel interviews tests and take home projects for perm roles), and of course the money.

In terms of learning, each contract is like spending 3 years in a permie job, and I’ve had 7 in the past 5 years.

— Hacker News

.

.

2022.02.17 Thursday ACHK

量子力學 3.1

這段改編自 2021 年 12 月 5 日的對話。

.

量子力學這門學問,「奇怪」的地方,不在於它奇怪。

「學習新領域時,學到新東西,遇到前所未見,意想不到的事物,而感到奇怪震驚」本身是,正常不過的事情。

.

量子力學的真正「奇怪」的地方是,在一連串的誤會之下,人們以為量子力學遺反了,最基本的邏輯定律。那又稱為「亞里士多德定律」,主旨是:

對於任何命題「甲」,「甲」或「非甲」的其一必為真,但兩句一定不會同時為真。

(證明很簡單,因為根本毋須證明;那只是「非」這個字的定義。)

.

「量子遺反邏輯」這錯覺,來自教學上的失誤,例如:

在電子雙狹縫實驗中,如果沒有安裝任何偵測器,去觀察電子的路徑軌跡的話,每一粒電子都會,同時通過左狹縫和右狹縫,去到板的另一邊。

由於隔板上,只有左右兩個狹縫,所以,「右」就即是「非左」。那就即是話:「每一粒電子都會同時,通過左狹縫和不通過左狹縫。

.

如果認清和防範,這類嘩眾取寵式,而導致錯誤的表述的話,你最終會知道,量子力學不單遵守邏輯,而且還甚至,「主動」守護了因果律。

— Me@2022-02-17 10:31:59 AM

.

.

2022.02.17 Thursday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK