Author Archives: rpflee

軟硬智力 3.3

Posted on by

連繫智力 2.3

這段改編自 2010 年 3 月 20 日的對話。

智力的高低，無論從「軟件」還是「硬件」方面看，都是取決於網絡的疏密。

軟件網絡：

如果你吸收了充足的知識，而又能夠將它們融會貫通，形成一個精密的意念網絡的話，你的思考速度就會足夠高。你的愚蠢程度，就會相當有限。

硬件前言：

人的大腦是沒有 CPU（中央處理器）的。

人的思考，是靠大腦中的神經細胞。那些神經細胞，叫做「神經元」。

個別的神經元是沒有意識的。神經元之間互相連繫，互相溝通，形成一個複雜的神經元網絡。正如很多電話透過電話線，形成電話網絡一樣。人的思考意識，來自這個神經元網絡。

智力越高，代表神經元之間的連繫越多，網絡越複雜；專長越專，代表個別連繫路線的頻寬高，導致某一組神經元之間，可以有高速的訊息傳遞。

硬件網絡：

如果你大腦眾多神經元之間，有著充足的連繫，而個別的路線，又強大寬闊的話，你的大腦，就擁有一個精密而高速的神經元網絡。換而言之，你的思考速度就會足夠高。你的愚蠢程度，就會相當有限。

那樣，有什麼方法，可以增多和增強，神經元之間的連繫呢？

— Me@2008.02.06

— Me@2012.03.30 

2012.03.30 Friday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

Fear | Hope

Posted on by

.

Fear cannot be without hope nor hope without fear.

– Spinoza

.

… because they both are due to uncertainties.

— Me@2012-03-27 12:24:02 PM

2012.03.28 Wednesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

Quantum cosmology

Posted on by

… the universe is the sum total of all that is in existence. Physically, a (physical) observer outside of the universe would require the breaking of gauge invariance, and a concomitant alteration in the mathematical structure of the theory. Similarly, RQM conceptually forbids the possibility of an external observer. Since the assignment of a quantum state requires at least two “objects” (system and observer), which must both be physical systems, there is no meaning in speaking of the “state” of the entire universe.

This is because this state would have to be ascribed to a correlation between the universe and some other physical observer, but this observer in turn would have to form part of the universe, and as was discussed above, it is impossible for an object to give a complete specification of itself. Following the idea of relational networks above, an RQM-oriented cosmology would have to account for the universe as a set of partial systems providing descriptions of one another. The exact nature of such a construction remains an open question.

— Wikipedia on Relational quantum mechanics

2012.03.27 Tuesday ACHK

人生漫步

Posted on by

.

King believes that, generally speaking, good stories cannot be called consciously and should not be plotted out beforehand; they are better served by focusing on a single “seed” of a story and letting the story grow itself.

– Wikipedia

.

.

.

2009.07.01 Wednesday ACHK

無限旅程 3

Posted on by

The mind which has become accustomed to the freedom and impartiality of philosophic contemplation will preserve something of the same freedom and impartiality in the world of action and emotion. It will view its purposes and desires as parts of the whole, with the absence of insistence that results from seeing them as infinitesimal fragments in a world of which all the rest is unaffected by any one man’s deeds. The impartiality which, in contemplation, is the unalloyed desire for truth, is the very same quality of mind which, in action, is justice, and in emotion is that universal love which can be given to all, and not only to those who are judged useful or admirable. Thus contemplation enlarges not only the objects of our thoughts, but also the objects of our actions and our affections: it makes us citizens of the universe, not only of one walled city at war with all the rest. In this citizenship of the universe consists man’s true freedom, and his liberation from the thraldom of narrow hopes and fears.

Thus, to sum up our discussion of the value of philosophy; Philosophy is to be studied, not for the sake of any definite answers to its questions since no definite answers can, as a rule, be known to be true, but rather for the sake of the questions themselves; because these questions enlarge our conception of what is possible, enrich our intellectual imagination and diminish the dogmatic assurance which closes the mind against speculation; but above all because, through the greatness of the universe which philosophy contemplates, the mind also is rendered great, and becomes capable of that union with the universe which constitutes its highest good.

— Bertrand Russell: The Value of Philosophy

— Chapter XV of The Problems of Philosophy

永恆感覺

無限旅程

— Me@2012-03-26 10:18:27 AM

2012.03.26 Monday ACHK

連繫智力 2.2

Posted on by

無足夠資料 7.2 | 西瓜 4

無知    （matters of facts）    綜合句

要去除無知，就要博覽群書，看破紅塵，以獲取充足的思考材料。

愚蠢    （relations of ideas）    重言句

要刪減愚蠢，就要連繫意念，融會貫通，以建構高速的思考網絡。

— Me@2012.03.26 

2012.03.26 Monday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

Classical logic 2

Posted on by

Quantum logic can be formulated either as a modified version of propositional logic or as a noncommutative and non-associative many-valued (MV) logic.

— Wikipedia on Quantum logic

2012.03.25 Sunday ACHK

Dog 2

Posted on by

.

Intellect is invisible to the man who has none.

– Arthur Schopenhauer

.

Kindness is invisible to the man who has none.

– Me@2010.07.22

.

If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.

– Mark Twain

.

.

.

2010.07.23 Friday ACHK

Equivalence principle

Posted on by

From this principle, Einstein deduced that free-fall is actually inertial motion. Objects in free-fall really do not accelerate, but rather the closer they get to an object such as the Earth, the more the time scale becomes stretched due to spacetime distortion around the planetary object (this is gravity). An object in free-fall is in actuality inertial, but as it approaches the planetary object the time scale stretches at an accelerated rate, giving the appearance that it is accelerating towards the planetary object when, in fact, the falling body really isn’t accelerating at all. This is why an accelerometer in free-fall doesn’t register any acceleration; there isn’t any. By contrast, in Newtonian mechanics, gravity is assumed to be a force.

— Wikipedia on Equivalence principle

2012.03.23 Friday ACHK

唔識就飛 9

Posted on by

這段改編自 2010 年 5 月 26 日的對話。

.

* This item was deleted.

Note. Figures in brackets indicate the percentages of candidates choosing the correct answers.

General note on item deletion

It is normal for the HKEAA to delete a small number of items from its multiple-choice question papers if they prove unsatisfactory. In practice, there are a number of reasons why this is considered necessary. By far the most common reason for deleting an item is that the item fails to discriminate between weak and able candidates — in other words, the majority of the candidates involved had to rely on guesswork in answering that question. If such an item is retained, the measurement process is rendered less effective. Where items have been deleted in the live papers, they are still included in this series of publications. They are indicated as deleted items. Such items may be discussed in the corresponding examination reports.

— HKEAA

.

在香港的中學公開試中，間中有一些多項選擇題（multiple choices），會在考試後被考試局刪除。換句話說，那些題目的分數，不會計算在總分之中。

某一題被刪除，其中一個可能的原因是，該題每個答案的選擇人數差不多，都是大概 25%。那就即是話，大部分人也是隨意估計的。那樣，該題就失去了考試的意義，因為它不能再用來，判別考生學問的高低。

對於任何一題，只要在指定時間內想不到，就應該立刻暫時放棄。你應先隨機填一個答案，待完成了其他題目，還有時間剩餘的話，才回來再想。除了我以前講的理由外，現在還多了一個考慮：

某一題所需的思考時間過長，並不一定是因為你的才能不及。那亦可能是該題過深，根本絕大部分其他考生也不懂做。如果你堅持要完成，即使最終得到正確答案，也會得不償失。一來，你已經用了過多的時間，導致自己來不及，妥善完成其他題目。二來，該題最終可能被取消。

留意，即使決定了暫時放棄某一題，你也一定要先隨機填一個答案，才去做下一題。在多項選擇題的答題紙上，留下空格，是極之危險的事情，因為那可能會導致你，往後題目的答案「轉移」，全部填錯位置。

— Me@2012.03.23

.

.

2012.03.23 Friday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK