Knowing your own darkness is the best method for dealing with the darknesses of other people.
— Carl Jung
2012.03.11 Sunday ACHK
Category Archives: multi-mind | 多重自我
Self Reliance 11
Self-reliance, the height and perfection of man, is reliance on God.
– Ralph Waldo Emerson (1854)
.
.
2008.03.02 Sunday ACHK
潛行凶間 2.2
夢中多重自我
 |
| Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. |
A human mind is a fractal.
— Me@2010.08.02
2012.02.18 Saturday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Layer, 3.2
水平 7.2 | Onion self 5.2 | Inner and outer, 5.2
.
One’s deepest self is the universe.
That’s why everyone’s deepest self is the same.
— Me@2012-01-26 4:30:09 PM
.
The diagram is not the truth. Instead, it is an analogy. It is a model only.
— Me@2012.02.11
.
Everyone is not a part of the universe, but the whole of the universe.
Everyone is a layer of the universe.
— Me@2012-02-06 11:31:17 PM
.
A, B, C are three people.
They are just like three waves of the same underlying ocean (universe).
— Me@2012-02-08 12:55:31 PM
.
.
2012.02.13 Monday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Inner and outer, 5
Layer, 3 | 水平 7 | Onion self 5
The deeper the consciousness, the more powerful it is.
— Me@2010.08.06
 |
| The diagram is not the truth. Instead, it is an analogy. It is a model only. |
—
Me@2012-02-08 12:55:31 PM
The deepest self is the universe.
— Me@2012-01-16 2:20:19 AM
The diagram is not the truth. Instead, it is an analogy. It is a model only.
— Me@2012.02.11
2012.02.11 Saturday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Recursion 8.2
I am a Strange Loop, 3.2
When I am conscious, different times of myself-s interact.
When different times of the same (software) object interact, there comes consciousness.
The past is part of the present.
So consciousness comes from the whole-part interaction.
— Me@2012-01-24 11:03:37 AM
2012.02.05 Sunday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Onion self, 2 + 3
Onion self 4 | 洋蔥自我 4 | Inner and outer, 4 | T-duality, 4
One’s deepest self is the universe.
That’s why everyone’s deepest self is the same.
— Me@2012-01-26 4:30:09 PM
2012.01.28 Saturday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Recursion 8
I am a Strange Loop, 3 | 自我思源
When an object gets information from another object, there is no consciousness.
When an object starts to observe (entangle with) itself, there comes consciousness.
— Me@2012-01-01 9:15:01 PM
2012.01.24 Tuesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Onion self 3
洋蔥自我 3
Inner and outer, 2
Only the deepest self (pure self, 純元我) is real.
The deepest self is the universe.
— Me@2012-01-16 2:20:19 AM
2012.01.18 Wednesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
魔間傳奇 11
快樂之道 3
這段改編自 2010 年 3 月 6 日的對話。
我發覺我二十歲時的智力，或者境界，和現在幾乎沒有分別。唯一的主要分別，就是現在的自己對世事的理解，因為掌握多了具體的資料，而深刻了很多。那些資料中，最重要的一個環節是：
現實世界的人所能達到的愚蠢程度，比我能夠想像的最極端情況，還要大很多。
“The secret of happiness is to face the fact that the world is horrible, horrible, horrible. “
哲學家羅素（Bertrand Russell）講過：「快樂之道，在於認清現實世界的恐怖。」
我對這句的詮釋是，正如馬克吐溫（Mark Twain）所言，如果你知道世人都是瘋狂的話，你會發現，世間上很多原本不能解釋的事情，都可以解釋到。當你開始明白了一些原本不能明白的東西時，你的應世技巧自然大大提升，世人很難可以再傷害到你。
比喻說，當你不知道世上有電腦病毒時，即使自己的電腦中了毒，你也不知道。相反，當你認清世上不單有電腦病毒，而且有極多時，你就會有所防範，例如安裝防毒程式，從而大大減低了中毒的機會。
留意，瘋狂的世人，包括你自己。
— Me@2011.12.28
2011.12.28 Wednesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Mirror selves
Other people are mirrors. Without them, you cannot see yourself, especially your higher self.
Use a different mirror, you see a different self.
— Me@2011.11.30
2011.11.30 Wednesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Two dimensional time 1.3
Everyone has multiple minds.
Each mind can be regarded as a timeline.
So even for a single person, there are multiple timelines, thus two dimensional time.
As long as there is parallel processing, there is two-dimensional time.
— Me@2011.11.11
2011.11.12 Saturday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Two dimensional time 1.2
Timeline = causal-chain
Everyone has a timeline.
Everyone is a timeline.
— Me@2011.11.11
2011.11.12 Saturday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Two dimensional time
One person has one timeline. Multiple people have multiple timelines.
Multiple-people is a form of two dimensional time, because you have to specify which person (i.e. which timeline) and what time.
— Me@2011.11.10
2011.11.11 Friday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Neural correlates of consciousness
The neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) constitute the minimal set of neuronal events and mechanisms sufficient for a specific conscious percept. Neuroscientists use empirical approaches to discover neural correlates of subjective phenomena. The set should be minimal because, while the entire brain is clearly sufficient to give rise to any given conscious experience, the question is which of its components were necessary to produce it.
— Wikipedia on Neural correlates of consciousness
2011.11.07 Monday ACHK
Phantom
Mara: “You who go where others dare not; Will you be my God? The architect of my house?”
Siddharta: “Finally I meet the illusion of self; Your evil house will not be built again.”
Mara: “But you live in me; I am your house.”
Siddharta: “O, trickster; phantom of my own ego, you are pure illusion. You, self, do not exist. The earth is my witness to this Supreme Enlightenment.”
— Wikipedia on Little Buddha
2007.06.20 2011.10.29 Saturday ACHK
Tree rings
年輪 | 年年齡 8 | Cumulative concept of time, 12
The younger tree is still here, for it is inner part of the present tree.
 |
| This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license. Author: Lawrence Murray from Perth, Australia |
present-self of the tree = younger-self of the tree + the outer layers [1]
— Me@2011.09.10
[1] This is not scientifically accurate. But it is a good analogy for illustrating the cumulative nature of time.
2011.09.11 Sunday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Windows 2.4
時間定義 11.4
現在任何一件事的發生，都不只建基於過去的某一件事。「Windows XP 的存在」並不是「Windows Vista 存在」的唯一先決條件。 Windows Vista 除了建基於 Windows XP 的源程式碼之外，還有不少外加元素。所以，把它們標籤為「同一個程式」的兩個版本，並非因為必然，而是為了商業上的便利，讓 Windows Vista 可以承繼 Windows XP 在市場上的身份。
試想想，如果 Microsoft（Windows 的製作公司）不把 Windows Vista 叫做「Windows Vista」，而把它叫做「Doors Vista」的話，後果會是怎麼樣？ Microsoft 會損失慘重： 大眾根本不知道「Doors Vista」是什麼，哪會有人敢購買？
把 Windows Vista 和 Windows XP 標籤為同一個程式的兩個版本，尚算「正常」，因為 Windows Vista 的確是建基於 Windows XP。至起碼，Windows Vista 有運用和修改過大量 Windows XP 的源程式碼。但是，有時候，會有一些「反常」的標籤出現。沒有關係的兩個程式，由於起了相似的名字，令人誤以為它們是同一個程式的兩個版本。看看這條時間線：
Windows 95 –> Windows 98 –> Windows 2000 –> Windows XP –> …
驟眼看來，有部分人以為， Windows 2000 是 Windows 98 的後續版本。實情是，它們除了外表介面相似以外，就幾乎沒有任何關係。如果不理外表和名字，只看它們的源程式碼的話，你會發覺，它們是沒有「血緣關係」的。我估計，它們只有少於 1% 的源程式碼是相同的，因為它們根本來自兩個不同的程式系列（Windows 9x 系 和 Windows NT 系）。正正是因為那樣，有部分在 Windows 98 運行到的電腦遊戲程式，並不能在 Windows 2000 上存活。
真正的「族譜」應該是：
Windows 9x
* Windows 4.0 (Windows 95) –> Windows 4.1 (Windows 98) –> Windows 4.9 (Windows Me)
Windows NT
* Windows NT 3.51 –> Windows NT 4.0 –> Windows NT 5.0 (Windows 2000) –> Windows NT 5.1 (Windows XP)
— Me@2011.08.24
2011.08.24 Wednesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Time travel, 3
時光機 3
Cumulative concept of time, 10
You can travel to the future since your future-self contains your present-self:
you travel to the future as long as you, somehow, do not change your present-self.
However, you cannot travel to the past, because by definition, your past-self does not contain your present-self:
your present-self is neither part of the past, nor part of your past-self.
— Me@2011.08.20
2011.08.21 Sunday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Windows 2.3
時間定義 11.3
我的「時間標籤論」是指，例如 Windows XP 和 Windows Vista 是應該被視為同一個程式的兩個版本，還是兩個不同的程式，我們有一定的自由度。但是，「時間標籤論」暫時仍未能解決「記憶問題」：既然 Windows Vista 有 Windows XP 的記憶，為何你仍然堅持，我們有自由度把它們標籤為兩個不同的程式呢？
我的「時間標籤論」要完備的話，就一定要修正這個漏洞。但是，我暫時想不到辦法。你有何高見？
我突然想通了：那其實即是一個「因果問題」。根據我們之前的講法，「原因」即是「先決條件」。以上所講，「時間標籤論」的漏洞，其實就即是以下的質疑：
Windows Vista 是建基於 Windows XP 編寫而成的。Windows XP 是 Windows Vista 的先決條件。沒有 Windows XP，就沒有 Windows Vista。所以，我們應該把它們標籤為同一個程式的兩個版本。Windows XP 應該被視為 Windows Vista 的「過去」。我們沒有權力，或者自由度，把它們標籤為兩個不同的程式。
對於這個質疑，我的反駁是，Windows Vista 除了建基於 Windows XP 的源程式碼之外，還有不少外加元素。而那些外加元素，是來自於 Windows XP 以外的源程式碼的。試想想，Windows Vista 有很多內置程式，是在 Windows XP 中，從來沒有出現過的。所以，Windows Vista 之所以存在的先決條件，並不只是有 Windows XP 一個。換句話說，除了 Windows XP 外，Windows Vista 還有其他的「過去」。
假設，總體而言，Windows Vista 建基於 Windows XP、程式甲、程式乙 和 程式丙。如果你質疑我「為何有你自由度把 Windows XP 和 Windows Vista 標籤為兩個不同程式」的話，我亦可以質疑你，為何有你自由度把 Windows XP 和 Windows Vista 標籤為同一個程式的兩個版本？還有，我可以再質疑你，為何你不把「程式甲」和 Windows Vista 標籤為同一個程式的兩個版本？
要化解「時間標籤論」的「記憶問題」，我們要留意，Windows Vista 除了有 Windows XP 的記憶外，還會有 Windows XP 以外的記憶。正如「2010 安」除了有「2005 安」的記憶外，還會有其他人的記憶。例如，「2010 安」在 2010 年之前閱讀過 愛因斯坦 的自傳的話，「2010 安」就會有 愛因斯坦 的部分記憶。又例如，「2010 安」在 2010 年之前跟過「老師甲」學習過唱歌的話，「2010 安」就會有 老師甲 的唱歌技巧記憶。
— Me@2011.08.16
2011.08.16 Tuesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Physics Town 
You must be logged in to post a comment.