An event is an operator on state, causing a change of state.
If states are points, events are arrows between points.
— Me@2011.06.20
— Me@2011.07.08
2011.07.08 Friday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
An event is an operator on state, causing a change of state.
If states are points, events are arrows between points.
— Me@2011.06.20
— Me@2011.07.08
2011.07.08 Friday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Free will lies in the limit of spacetime resolution.
The spacetime resolution is limited by the uncertainty principle,
which is due to the “one-input multiple-possible-output” nature of quantum mechanics.
— Me@2011.06.23
— Me@2011.07.04
2011.07.04 Monday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Whether you can have free will or not
= whether you can be a first cause or not
— Me@2011.06.29
2011.06.30 Thursday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Wave function collapse is another kind of T-asymmetry.
The appearance of wave function collapse is due to quantum decoherence.
— Me@2011.06.23
2011.06.28 Tuesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
The second law of thermodynamics is a macroscopic law.
Most of other physical laws are microscopic laws.
“The time arrow is due to the second law of thermodynamics” is tautological.
The second law of thermodynamics is due to decoherence among the motions of the particles of the system.
— Me@2011.06.23
— Me@2011.06.26
2011.06.26 Sunday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK
Time asymmetries are generally distinguished as between those intrinsic to the dynamic laws of nature, and those due to the initial conditions of our universe. The T-asymmetry of the weak force is of the first kind, while the T-asymmetry of the second law of thermodynamics is of the second kind.
— Wikipedia on T-symmetry
2011.06.24 Friday ACHK
Asperti and Longo [1]: “The basic premise of category theory is that every kind of mathematically structured object comes equipped with a notion of [ : : : ] transformation, called `morphism’, that preserves the structure of the object.”
— A Gentle Introduction to Category Theory
— Maarten M. Fokkinga
2011.06.23 Thursday ACHK
… relativity isn’t theory of relativity at all, it’s a theory of invariants (already Einstein made this observation, but it was too late, the current name had caught on). Some (and actually many) things in relativity are absolute.
– Marek
2011.06.19 Sunday ACHK
Choice in General Relativity: Metric, . Directly determines
Riemannian geometry; Geometrodynamics.
In all other interactions, by contrast, the basic variable is a Connection, i.e., a matrix valued vector potential .
Gauge theories: Connection-dynamics
Connections: Vehicles for parallel transport.
Classical singularities are gates to Physics Beyond Einstein.
— Introduction to Loop Quantum Gravity
— Abhay Ashtekar
2011.06.17 Friday ACHK
… it wouldn’t surprise me if much of the category theoretic ‘metaphysics’ gets done by computer science people and physicists.
— David Corfield
2011.06.14 Tuesday ACHK
After all, G2 is the automorphism group of the octonions, and it has a 7-dimensional irreducible representation on the imaginary octonions; as explained in “week104” by Robert Helling, the octonions are secretly what let you write down the superstring Lagrangian in 10d spacetime.
— John Baez
2011.06.10 Friday ACHK
The difference between the classical and quantum dynamical equations is just hidden in the fact that rho,x,p are operators in quantum theory and they generally don’t commute with each other. But otherwise, the interpretation from classical physics may be pretty much directly extended to the quantum theory!
— Density matrix and its classical counterpart
— Lubos Motl
2011.06.09 Thursday ACHK
Instead, the energy is universally defined in such a way that it is conserved as a result of the time-translational symmetry; and the action is defined in such a way that the condition δS=0 (stationarity of the action) is equivalent to the equations of motion. These are the general conditions that define the concepts in general and that make them important; particular formulae for the energy or action are just particular applications of the general rules.
— Lubos Motl
2011.06.06 Monday ACHK
Fermat’s principle is the main principle of quantum electrodynamics where it states that any particle (e.g. a photon or an electron) propagates over all available (unobstructed) paths and the interference (sum, or superposition) of its wavefunction over all those paths (at the point of observer or detector) gives the correct probability of detection of this particle (at this point). Thus the extremal (shortest, longest or stationary) paths contribute into this interference most as they can not be completely canceled out.
— Wikipedia on Fermat’s principle
2011.06.04 Saturday ACHK
How does the particle find the right path?
Does it ‘smell’ the neighboring paths to find out whether or not they have more action?
In the case of light, when we put blocks in the way so that the photons could not test all the paths, we found that they couldn’t figure out which way to go, and we had the phenomenon of diffraction.
— Chapter 19. The principle of least action
— Volume 2. Mainly electromagnetism and matter
— The Feynman Lectures on Physics
2011.06.02 Thursday ACHK
Curiosity turns work into play. For Einstein, relativity wasn’t a book full of hard stuff he had to learn for an exam. It was a mystery he was trying to solve. So it probably felt like less work to him to invent it than it would seem to someone now to learn it in a class.
–- Paul Graham
2011.06.01 Wednesday ACHK
Moreover, in the usual formulation of classical action principles, the initial and final states of the system are fixed, e.g.,
Given that the particle begins at position x1 at time t1 and ends at position x2 at time t2, the physical trajectory that connects these two endpoints is an extremum of the action integral.
In particular, the fixing of the final state appears to give the action principle a teleological character which has been controversial historically. However, this apparent teleology occurs only because of the way in which the question was asked. By specifying some but not all aspects of both the initial and final conditions (the positions but not the velocities) we are making some inferences about the initial conditions from the final conditions, and it is this “backward” inference that can be mistaken for a teleological causal influence.
— Wikipedia on Principle of least action
2011.05.30 Monday ACHK
When you are inspired by some great purpose, some extraordinary project, all your thoughts break their bonds: Your mind transcends limitations, your consciousness expands in every direction, and you find yourself in a new, great, and wonderful world. Dormant forces, faculties and talents become alive, and your discover yourself to be a greater person by far than you ever dreamed yourself to be.
– Yoga Sutras of Patanjali
2011.05.30 Monday ACHK
If you wanted to have the perfect life, the thing to do would be to go to grad school, secretly write your dissertation in the first year or two, and then just enjoy yourself for the next three years, dribbling out a chapter at a time. This prospect will make grad students’ mouths water, but I know of no one who’s had the discipline to pull it off.
— Paul Graham
2011.05.29 Sunday ACHK
Here’s the link between particle interchange and rotation: Look at the twist you introduced into your strip of paper. There is another way to introduce that type of twist. Instead of rotating one end, switch the position of the ends of your strip, while keeping both ends of the strip facing up.
—
2011.05.27 Friday ACHK
You must be logged in to post a comment.