Research

DDJ: In the presentation before the awarding of the Japan Prize today, you were quoted on the distinction between research and development. [The former, Thompson stated, was directionless, whereas development had a specific goal in mind.] So in that context, is Go experimental?

— Interview with Ken Thompson

— By Andrew Binstock, May 18, 2011

2011.05.24 Tuesday ACHK

Gluon 2

The photon does not carry electric charge with it, while the gluons do carry the “color charge”.

— HyperPhysics

2011.05.21 Saturday ACHK

Negative probability

In 1942, Paul Dirac wrote a paper: “The Physical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics” where he introduced the concept of negative energies and negative probabilities:

    “Negative energies and probabilities should not be considered as nonsense. They are well-defined concepts mathematically, like a negative of money.”

Negative probabilities have later been suggested to solve several problems and paradoxes. Half-coins provide simple examples for negative probabilities. These strange coins were introduced in 2005 by Gabor J. Szekely. Half-coins have infinitely many sides numbered with 0,1,2,… and the positive even numbers are taken with negative probabilities. Two half-coins make a complete coin in the sense that if we flip two half-coins then the sum of the outcomes is 0 or 1 with probability 1/2 as if we simply flipped a fair coin.

— Wikipedia on Negative probability

2011.05.19 Thursday ACHK

From Heisenberg to Godel

My student Mike Stay did computer science before he came to UCR. When he was applying, he mentioned a result he helped prove, which relates Godel’s theorem to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle:

2) C. S. Calude and M. A. Stay, From Heisenberg to Godel via Chaitin, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 44 (2005), 1053-1065. …

Now, this particular combination of topics is classic crackpot fodder. People think “Gee, uncertainty sounds like incompleteness, they’re both limitations on knowledge – they must be related!” and go off the deep end. So I got pretty suspicious until I read his paper and saw it was CORRECT… at which point I definitely wanted him around! The connection they establish is not as precise as I’d like, but it’s solid math.

— This Week’s Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 230)

— John Baez

2011.05.18 Wednesday ACHK

A Fraction of Algebra

As a mathematician there is a story I hear a lot. It tends to come up whenever I tell someone what I do for the first time, and they admit that they don’t really like, or aren’t very good at, mathematics. In almost every case, if I bother to ask (and these days I usually do), I find that the person, once upon a time, was good at and liked mathematics, but somewhere along the way they had a bad teacher, or struck a subject they couldn’t grasp at first, and fell a bit behind. From that point on their experiences of mathematics is a tale of woe: because mathematics piles layer upon layer, if you fall behind then you find yourself in a never ending game of catch-up, chasing a horizon that you never seem to reach; that can be very dispiriting and depressing.

— The Narrow Road, Zen and the Art of Mathematics

2011.05.12 Thursday ACHK

Spinors

Twistors are closely related to spinors, objects that may be understood as “square roots of vectors”. I like to say that twistors may similarly be interpreted as “square roots of spacetime points”.

Witten enters the scene

In 2003, Edward Witten published his papers on the twistor treatment of the maximally supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory in four dimensions. For the first time, geometry in the twistor space was used to calculate scattering amplitudes – quantities knowing about some real dynamics and interactions in physics.

— Lubos Motl

2011.05.11 Wednesday ACHK

The Cosmic Superconductor

The success of the electroweak sector of the standard model teaches us that what we perceive as empty space is in reality a cosmic superconductor – not, of course, for electromagnetic fields and currents, but for the currents that couple to W and Z bosons.

— Anticipating a New Golden Age

— Frank Wilczek

2011.05.10 Tuesday ACHK

Control the universe

“Emptiness is everywhere and it can be calculated, which gives us a great opportunity. I know how to control the universe. So tell me, why should I run for a million?” he told the Russian newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda.

— Math genius Grigori Perelman explains why he turned down $1 million prize

— By Nadine Bells | Good News – Wed, 4 May, 2011

2011.05.06 Friday ACHK

Anti de Sitter space 3

de Sitter Space distinguished from spacetime in general relativity

Fundamentally, the key concept behind the idea of de Sitter space is that it involves a variation on the spacetime of general relativity in which spacetime is itself slightly curved even in the absence of matter or energy.

An inherent curvature of spacetime even in the absence of matter or energy is another way of thinking about the idea of the cosmological constant in general relativity. An inherent curvature of spacetime and the cosmological constant are also equivalent to the idea that a vacuum (i.e. empty space without any matter or energy in it) has a fundamental energy of its own.

de Sitter space can also be thought of as a general relativity like spacetime in which empty space itself has some energy, which causes this spacetime (i.e. the universe) to expand at an ever greater rate.

— Wikipedia on Anti de Sitter space

2011.05.04 Wednesday ACHK

On Keeping Your Soul

The great challenge at the beginning of ones career in academia is to get tenure at a decent university. Personally I got tenure before I started messing with quantum gravity, and this approach has some real advantages. Before you have tenure, you have to please people. After you have tenure, you can do whatever the hell you want – so long as it’s legal, and so long as your department doesn’t put a lot of pressure on you to get grants. (This is one reason I’m happier in a math department than I would be in a physics department. Mathematicians have more trouble getting grants, so there’s a bit less pressure to get them.)

The great thing about tenure is that it means your research can be driven by your actual interests instead of the ever-changing winds of fashion. The problem is, by the time many people get tenure, they’ve become such slaves of fashion that they no longer know what it means to follow their own interests. They’ve spent the best years of their life trying to keep up with the Joneses instead of developing their own personal style! So, bear in mind that getting tenure is only half the battle: getting tenure while keeping your soul is the really hard part.

— Advice for the Young Scientist

— John Baez

2011.05.02 Monday ACHK

Broken symmetry 2

diff 3b

.

Mostly it is loss which teaches us about the worth of things.

— Arthur Schopenhauer

.

Anything that does not change you cannot see, because it falls into the background.

你不會到留意「正常」的事物,因為,它們會化成「背景」。

— Me@2011.04.22

.

想知一件事物的價值,你先要嘗試失去它。

你不會到留意「正常」的事物,因為腦部毋須處理「正常」的事物,所以會自動忽略它們,以節省資源去解決「問題」。(「問題」就是不如意的事物。)

— Me@2011.04.24

.

.

2011.04.24 Sunday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

Gauge theory 5

The importance of gauge theories for physics stems from the tremendous success of the mathematical formalism in providing a unified framework to describe the quantum field theories of electromagnetism, the weak force and the strong force. This theory, known as the Standard Model, accurately describes experimental predictions regarding three of the four fundamental forces of nature, and is a gauge theory with the gauge group SU(3) × SU(2) × U(1). Modern theories like string theory, as well as some formulations of general relativity, are, in one way or another, gauge theories.
 
— Wikipedia on Gauge theory

2011.04.18 Monday ACHK

Soliton

In mathematics and physics, a soliton is a self-reinforcing solitary wave (a wave packet or pulse) that maintains its shape while it travels at constant speed. Solitons are caused by a cancellation of nonlinear and dispersive effects in the medium.

Dispersion and non-linearity can interact to produce permanent and localized wave forms. Consider a pulse of light traveling in glass. This pulse can be thought of as consisting of light of several different frequencies. Since glass shows dispersion, these different frequencies will travel at different speeds and the shape of the pulse will therefore change over time. However, there is also the non-linear Kerr effect: the refractive index of a material at a given frequency depends on the light’s amplitude or strength. If the pulse has just the right shape, the Kerr effect will exactly cancel the dispersion effect, and the pulse’s shape won’t change over time: a soliton.

— Wikipedia on Soliton

2011.04.17 Sunday ACHK

Crazy

We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.

    Said to Wolfgang Pauli after his presentation of Heisenberg’s and Pauli’s nonlinear field theory of elementary particles, at Columbia University (1958), as quoted in Symposium on Basic Research (1959) by Dael Lee Wolfle, p. 66
   
   
Your theory is crazy, but it’s not crazy enough to be true.

— Niels Bohr

2011.04.14 Thursday ACHK

微積分

這段改篇自 2010 年 5 月 1 日的對話。

「微積分」的概念,可能會比其他課題抽象,因為牽涉到「無限大」和「無限小」。但是,「微積分」的運算,說穿了,只是一大堆公式的背誦,不是什麼抽象的思考。你可以把學習「微積分」,看成學習一個「高級乘數表」的過程。

你在計算乘數時,並不會有什麼抽象的思維。你所做的,只是把乘數表背出來。所以,平時我說「我懂做乘數」並不是指,我對「乘數」有什麼深刻的了解。「我懂做乘數」的意思是,我背誦了「乘數表」,而且純熟到它已變成了我的自然反應。

(再者,想要對「乘數」的意思有深刻的了解,並不是那麼簡單容易。例如,5 x 2 = 5 + 5 ; 5 x 3 = 5 + 5 + 5。那樣,「5 x 2.1」究竟是什麼意思呢?)

同理,想要「微積分」的運算做得好,並不是要花大量時間,做抽象的思考,去了解「微積分」背後的終極真相。反而,你真正需要做的,只是把「微分(公式)表」和「積分表」背誦好,再加大量的練習,令到它們變成了你的條件反射。

— Me@2011.04.12

In mathematics you don’t understand things. You just get used to them.

— John Von Neumann

2011.04.12 Tuesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK