A Few Tricks

Every Mathematician Has Only a Few Tricks

A long time ago an older and well-known number theorist made some disparaging remarks about Paul Erdos’s work. You admire Erdos’s contributions to mathematics as much as I do, and I felt annoyed when the older mathematician flatly and definitively stated that all of Erdos’s work could be “reduced” to a few tricks which Erdos repeatedly relied on in his proofs.

What the number theorist did not realize is that other mathematicians, even the very best, also rely on a few tricks which they use over and over.

Take Hilbert. The second volume of Hilbert’s collected papers contains Hilbert’s papers in invariant theory. I have made a point of reading some of these papers with care. It is sad to note that some of Hilbert’s beautiful results have been completely forgotten. But on reading the proofs of Hilbert’s striking and deep theorems in invariant theory, it was surprising to verify that Hilbert’s proofs relied on the same few tricks. Even Hilbert had only a few tricks!

— Ten Lessons I Wish I Had Been Taught

— Gian-Carlo Rota

2012.05.13 Sunday ACHK

流言終結者 3

這段改編自 2010 年 3 月 20 日的對話。

香港其實也有貌似《MythBusters》(流言終結者),這類探究傳說流言的節目。可惜,香港的版本,是偏重於「傳說流言」本身,而不是「傳說流言的真偽」。節目的主持人和製作人,很少會花大量的時間,去做 科學實驗 或者 歷史考究,以驗證傳說流言的虛實。描述了一個傳說流言以後,結論也往往只是「那仍然是一個謎」。它們至多只可以視作是,比較高級的娛樂節目,而算不上是什麼科學資訊節目。

「那仍然是一個謎」的思考態度,與《流言終結者》「求證求真」的科學精神,相去甚遠。但是,「那仍然是一個謎」的境界,已經遠高於一般的地球人,因為至起碼,它「不知為不知」:把不知道的東西,標籤為「未知」。

一般人的水平,差到不只是「先入為主」,甚至「先入為對」。他們的(不)思考系統,會自動將第一次聽到東西,視為真實當然。往後,如果有新的講法,與自己原本的背景「知識」有衝突,他們會堅持「己」見。這個現象,我戲稱為「第一次為真」定律。

— Me@2012.05.13 

2012.05.13 Sunday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK