Wikipedia, which just recently celebrated its 10th birthday, is astonishing in its breadth and scope, but there’s only so much that any encyclopedia, limited to verifiable facts about discrete nouns, can capture within the entirety of human knowledge. On the other end of the spectrum, sites like Facebook and Twitter allow people to describe their lives and to make personal observations, but on such networks it’s hard to separate the informed opinion from the pure speculation.
The large expanse between the two approaches — the purely objective and the purely subjective — is the terrain that Quora hopes to occupy.
The early leader in social networking, Friendster, had terrible technology. The advertising-heavy MySpace, which dethroned Friendster, was a bit like Yahoo Answers: chaotic and low-rent, prone to spammers and scams. Yet both were immensely popular — until Facebook came along and figured out how to do social networking right.
— Does Quora Really Have All the Answers?
— Wired May 2011
— Gary Rivlin
2012.05.24 Thursday ACHK