Gravity as an entropic force, 2

The authors of the flawed preprint used at least two (but related) invalid arguments in their attempts to resuscitate Erik Verlinde’s theory. One of them was the claim that Verlinde’s theory produces the “right classical limit”. When this classical limit is quantized, one obtains the right quantum theory, including the neutron interference. However, this argument incorrectly assumes that quantum physics is uniquely determined by a classical limit. It’s not. If you take the classical limit C of a quantum theory Q and “quantize” C again, you don’t necessarily get Q.

In particular, when we talk about the distance-dependent entropy, it’s a feature of a physical theory that holds both in the quantum theory Q and in the classical limit C. And in the quantum theory, it automatically destroys the interference patterns because there exists no one-to-one way how to link microstates at different separations (because their numbers differ). So there can’t exist any quantum theory that preserves the interference but that still produces a classical limit with a distance-dependent entropy.

— Once more: gravity is not an entropic force

— Lubos Motl

2012.12.25 Tuesday ACHK

SICM, 3.2

這段改編自 2010 年 4 月 3 日的對話。

《SICM》(Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics)中的編程語言,除了 Scheme 的本體外,還會用到作者特製的力學程式庫 Scmutils。而這個程式庫(library)卻只有 Linux 的版本,不能安裝在 Windows 之中。那導致我要特意在我的 Windows 中,先裝一個 virtual machine(虛擬機器),從而在那個虛擬機器之上,再安裝一個 Linux 作業系統。

閱讀《SICM》,除了間接令我,發現「時間」的定義外,還令我第一次接觸「virtual machine」這個概念。兩者各自都是,我個人智力發展的一個里程碑。

— Me@2012.12.25

2012.12.25 Tuesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

For all, 1.2

Universe 2.2

Defining the word “universe” as “all the things” does not totally make sense, since the meaning of “all” is relative to a place. Without a context such as “all things in this house“, the word “all” is meaningless. To be meaningful, you have to specify what the word “all” is with respect to.

Instead of “all the things“, we can define “universe” as

universe = all the things observable by an observer, directly or indirectly, in practice or in principle, plus the observer itself  

— Me@2012.10.16

— Me@2012.12.24

2012.12.24 Monday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK