人格堤壩 2

假設某人(甲)是一個不誠實的人。究竟他是「每 100 句說話中,有 1 句假話」,還是「每 100 句說話中,有 99 句是假話」呢?你是沒有辦法分辨得到的。

那會導致同甲相處時,我要付出很大的時間和精神成本。他每講完一句說話,我也要盤算:「他這句是真還是假呢?」最麻煩的地方是,「盤算」了後,我其實也不知道,他的說話內容中,有多少句是謊話、有哪幾句是謊話。

整體的效果是,「與甲相處」會令我神經衰弱。「與甲相處」的最好方法是,「不要跟他相處」。

對說謊的人最大的報應是,凡是誠實的人,都不會跟他做朋友。同理,如果一間公司的「人格」有問題的話,它自然吸引不到才德上佳的員工。長遠來說,該間公司是自取滅亡。

— Me@2010.07.02

2010.07.02 Friday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

S-duality

In theoretical physics, S-duality (also a strong-weak duality) is an equivalence of two quantum field theories, string theories, or M-theory. An S-duality transformation maps the states and vacua with coupling constant g in one theory to states and vacua with coupling constant 1 / g in the dual theory. This has permitted the use of perturbation theory, normally useful only for “weakly coupled” theories with g less than 1, to also describe the “strongly coupled” (g greater than 1) regimes of string theory, by mapping them onto dual, weakly coupled regimes.

— Wikipedia on S-duality

2010.07.01 Thursday ACHK

Rinus Michels

.

Marinus (“Rinus”) Jacobus Hendricus Michels (9 February 1928 – 3 March 2005) was a Dutch football player and coach who was named “coach of the century” by FIFA in 1999. He played his entire career for the club Ajax Amsterdam, whom he later coached, and was a member of the Netherlands national team both as a player and as manager.

Michels became most notable for his coaching achievements, having won the European Cup with Ajax and the Spanish league with Barcelona, and having had four tenures as coach of the Netherlands national team, whom he led to reach the final match of the 1974 World Cup and to win the 1988 European Championship. He is credited with the invention of a major football tactic known as “Total Football” in the 1970s.

— Wikipedia on Rinus Michels

.

.

.

2010.07.01 Thursday ACHK

選圖三部曲

選圖問題 3

Choosing a graph 3

1991-CE-PHY II-7 b

這段改篇自 2010 年 3 月 18 日的對話。

因為這 4 條式,假設了「constant acceleration」,所以,在不是「constant acceleration」的情況下,就不可以用。換言之,如果題目提到「constant acceleration」的話,即是暗示了你要用那四條 kinematic equations 的其中一條。

Constant force –> constant acceleration –> kinematic equations

那現在應該用這 4 條公式中的哪一條呢?

題目給你選的圖全部也是 vt graph,所以你應該用有 tv 的那一條式,即是

除了「constant force(恆力)」外,你剛才還間底了「initially at rest(初始時,物體為靜止)」。 「constant force」這個資料已經用了。現在是用「initially at rest」的時候。「initially at rest」,即是 u = 0 。 所以方程式可以化簡為

凡是這類「選圖問題」,如果你不是立刻「感受」到哪個是答案的話,你就一定要用以下的三部曲

1. 寫下一條方程式,連繫起 x-軸 和 y-軸 的 variables(變量)。

2. 看看該條公式是 一次方()還是 二次方()。如果是一次方(linear)的話,該圖就是一條直線。如果是 二次方(quadratic)的話,該圖就是一條曲線(拋物線)。

3.1 如果是直線的話(),看看 m 是正還是負,就可以知道那條直線的斜率(slope)是正還是負,因為 m 本身就是代表斜率。

3.11 m 正的話,那條直線就是向右上發展的。

3.12 m = 0 的話,那條直線就是一條平線。

3.13 m 負的話,那條直線就是向右下發展的。

3.2 如果是拋物線的話(),看看 a 是正還是負。

3.21 a 正的話,那條拋物線就是向上張開的(open upwards)。

3.22 a 負的話,那條拋物線就是向下張開的(open downwards)。

— Me@2010.07.01

2010.07.01 Thursday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

Total Football

荷蘭足球

全能足球

.

“Total Football” is the label given to an influential tactical theory of association football in which any outfield player can take over the role of any other player in a team (save the goalkeeper). It was pioneered by Dutch football club Ajax from 1969 to 1973, and further used by the Netherlands National Football Team in the 1974 FIFA World Cup. It was invented by Rinus Michels, a famous Dutch football trainer/coach (who was the coach of both Ajax and the Netherlands national team at the time).

In Total Football, a player who moves out of his position is replaced by another from his team, thus retaining the team’s intended organizational structure. In this fluid system, no player is fixed in his nominal role; anyone can be successively an attacker, a midfielder and a defender. The only player fixed in his nominal position is the goalkeeper.

Total Football’s tactical success depends largely on the adaptability of each footballer within the team, in particular his ability to quickly switch positions depending on the on-field situation. The theory requires players to be comfortable in multiple positions; hence, it places high technical and physical demands on them.

— Wikipedia on Total Football

.

.

.

2010.06.30 Wednesday ACHK

人格堤壩

堤壩有缺口,就很容易被完全摧毀,所以必須立刻修補。如果不修補缺口,又要避免堤壩被毀的話,你就要保證那個缺口不會變大。但是,「防止缺口變大」的工程成本,往往會比「直接修補缺口」大。所以,「選擇『防止缺口變大』,而不選擇『直接修補缺口』」是庸人自擾的做法。

如果你的人格有缺失,例如,你是一個不誠實的人,你就很容易會被你自己的謊言所摧毀。要麼你就改正自己,不要再說謊。要麼你就好好「經營」那堆謊言,保證它們不會變大。但是,「防止謊言變多變大」的精神成本,往往會比「直接修補人格」大。所以,「選擇『經營謊言』,而不選擇『經營人格』」是庸人自擾的做法。

記住,千萬不要說假話,除非遇上極端的情形。「極端的情形」是指「如果當時不立刻直接說假話,別人或自己就會受到嚴重的傷害」。但是,既然稱得上是「極端的情形」,即是很少會發生。所以,在絕大部分情況下,你是不需要說假話的。

但是,在現實中,很多時有「不能說真話」的情況。那怎麼辦呢?

「不能說真話」並不代表「需要說假話」,因為你可選擇「既不說真話,又不說假話」。方法有很多,例如:

1. 不說話;

2. 說廢話;

3. 說模稜兩可的話;

4. 逃走;

5. etc.

— Me@2010.06.30

2010.06.30 Wednesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

Superstring theory

It wasn’t clear how relevant this is to the physics of our particular universe, but at the end of the talk Dijkgraaf urged us not to worry about that too much: after all, the math is so pretty in its own right. Insofar as I’m a physicist this makes me unhappy – but in my other persona, as a mathematician, it makes sense.

— John Baez

2010.06.29 Tuesday ACHK

偉大o既藝術家

.

當乜野人都唔搵我做野,我就知道,我係一個偉大o既藝術家,在生o既時候係唔會獲得應得o既尊重。

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

唔止咁,我重偉大過偉大o既藝術家,因為我知道,我死後都唔會受到尊重。

— 黃子華

.

.

.

2010.06.29 Tuesday ACHK

選圖問題 2

Choosing a graph 2 | 多項選擇題 2.2 | Multiple Choices 2.2 | 1991-CE-PHY II-7 a

這段改編自 2010 年 3 月 18 日的對話。

.

這題的重點是,你要間底(underline)「constant force(恆力)」。

上次我提過,在閱讀 MC(Multiple Choices, 多項選擇)題目時,你一定要間底重要的字眼(underlining the keywords)。通常每組重要字眼,都會對應於一條公式。

例如,在這一題(1991-CE-PHY II-7),你間底了「constant force」和「initially at rest(初始時,物體為靜止)」。「Constant force」對應於「constant acceleration(恆加速度)」,因為,如果該題只有 F 一個力的話, F = ma。(只有在 F 等於淨力(net force)時,F 才會等於 ma。) 而「constant acceleration」就代表你可以用以下的 kinematic equations(運動學方程):

因為這 4 條式假設了「constant acceleration」,所以,在不是「constant acceleration」的情況下,不可以用。換言之,如果題目提到「constant acceleration」的話,即是暗示了,你要用那四條 kinematic equations 的其中一條。

constant net force –> constant acceleration –> kinematic equations

— Me@2010.06.29

— Me@2019.02.05

.

.

2010.06.29 Tuesday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

Cosmic string

String theory and cosmic strings

There is no direct connection between string theory and the theory of cosmic strings (the names were chosen independently by analogy with ordinary string).

However, work in string theory revived interest in cosmic strings in the early 2000s. In 2002 Henry Tye and collaborators observed the production of cosmic strings during the last stages of brane inflation. It was also pointed out by string theorist Joseph Polchinski that the expanding Universe could have stretched a “fundamental” string (the sort which superstring theory considers) until it was of intergalactic size. Such a stretched string would exhibit many of the properties of the old “cosmic” string variety, making the older calculations useful again. Furthermore, modern superstring theories offer other objects which could feasibly resemble cosmic strings, such as highly elongated one-dimensional D-branes (known as “D-strings”). As theorist Tom Kibble remarks, “string theory cosmologists have discovered cosmic strings lurking everywhere in the undergrowth”. Older proposals for detecting cosmic strings could now be used to investigate superstring theory.

— Wikipedia on Cosmic string

2010.06.28 Monday ACHK

Isaac Newton

.

To do really great things, you have to seek out questions people didn’t even realize were questions.

You only get one life. Why not do something huge?

And you know more are out there, separated from us by what will later seem a surprisingly thin wall of laziness and stupidity.

— Paul Graham

.

.

.

2010.06.28 Monday ACHK

專利

「專利制度」表面上,主要是為了保障新產品發明者的利益而設的。那是大眾的誤解。實情是,「專利制度」的存在,主要是為了社會的整體利益。文明社會確立「專利制度」,是「兩害取其輕」的結果。

在有「專利制度」之前,新產品發明者為了保障自己的利益,往往會隱藏新產品的建構方法,導致很多新創見隨著發明者的離世而失傳。為了避免這種情形,人們創立了「專利制度」,容許新產品發明者為自己的新設計申請「專利」。申請成功的話,社會就賦予發明者長達大約 17 年的特權:只有他可以使用該設計來製造產品。

為什麼那就可以避免「新創見失傳」呢?

申請「專利」的先決條件是,發明者不單要公開自己新產品的建構方法,而且還要鉅細無遺地描述,哪些地方是全新的意念。在 17 年過後,全人類可以共同擁有使用那些新意念。

— Me@2010.06.28

2010.06.28 Monday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

Fourth dimension

Visual scope

Being three-dimensional, we are only able to see the world with our eyes in two dimensions. A four-dimensional being would be able to see the world in three dimensions. For example, it would be able to see all six sides of an opaque box simultaneously, and in fact, what is inside the box at the same time, just as we can see the interior of a square on a piece of paper. It would be able to see all points in 3-dimensional space simultaneously, including the inner structure of solid objects and things obscured from our three-dimensional viewpoint.

— Wikipedia on Fourth dimension

2010.06.27 Sunday ACHK

選圖問題

Choosing a graph

1990-CE-PHY II-1

1990-CE-PHY II-4

1990-CE-PHY II-8

1991-CE-PHY II-3

1991-CE-PHY II-7

1992-CE-PHY II-1

1993-CE-PHY II-5

1994-CE-PHY II-9

1995-CE-PHY II-4

1996-CE-PHY II-4

2000-CE-PHY II-7

2000-CE-PHY II-9

2001-CE-PHY II-7

2002-CE-PHY II-3

2002-CE-PHY II-8

— Me@2010.06.27

2010.06.27 Sunday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

Anti de Sitter space

Some of the differences between the familiar Newtonian equation of gravity and the predictions of general relativity flow from the fact that gravity in general relativity bends both time and space, not just space. In normal circumstances, gravity bends time so slightly that the difference between Newtonian gravity and general relativity that results is so slight that it is impossible to detect without scientific instruments.

— Wikipedia on Anti de Sitter space

2010.06.26 Saturday ACHK

魔間傳奇 3

.

I’m the last survivor of a dead culture. And I don’t really belong in the world anymore. And in some ways I feel I ought to be dead. I have certainly wished I had killed myself when I was born.

In terms of effect on the world, it’s very good that I’ve lived. And so I guess, if I could go back in time and prevent my birth, I wouldn’t do it. But I sure wish I hadn’t had so much pain.

— Richard Stallman, inventor of the Copyleft

.

.

.

2010.06.26 Saturday ACHK

傳世之作

網誌時代 4

簡言之,即使兩者的文章完全相同,「閱讀網誌」和「閱讀書本」的感覺不同,引致有不同的效果。

而且,如果真的把網誌化成書本的話,很少作者會真的把自己網誌的所有文章,也原封不動地列印成書。作者通常也會只選擇網誌中,較滿意的文章,然後再稍作整理,才把它們輯錄成書。「稍作整理」的工作量是十分驚人的。即使不作任何整理,單單是「選擇文章」時要取捨得好,已經需要相當的功力。

選擇文章後,除了要為被選文章「稍作整理」外,還要為它們「排次序」。「排次序」本身,並不是次要的工作,因為即使是同一堆文章,不同的次序,可以帶出不同的意境。

換言之,要把網誌文章輯錄成書,而又有機會成為「傳世之作」的話,起碼要過 4 關,即是要 文章好、取捨好、整理好 和 次序好。

— Me@2010.06.25

Words differently arranged have a different meaning, and meanings differently arranged have a different effect.

— Blaise Pascal

2010.06.26 Saturday (c) All rights reserved by ACHK

The Phone Book

In physics, Gravitation is a very important reference book on Einstein’s theory of gravity by Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne, and John Archibald Wheeler. Often considered the “Bible” of General Relativity by researchers for its prominence, it is frequently called MTW after its authors’ initials, or “the Phone Book” due to its immense size. It was published by W.H. Freeman and Company in 1973. The book, a massive tome of over 1200 pages, covers many aspects of the General Theory of Relativity and also considers some extensions and experimental confirmation. The book is divided into two “tracks”, the second of which covers more advanced topics for more capable or determined students. MTW uses the -+++ metric convention. The book is famous/infamous for its use of boxes to add supplementary substance to the already thorough main text.

* Misner, Charles W.; Thorne, Kip S.; Wheeler, John Archibald (1973-09-15 1973), Gravitation, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, ISBN 978-0-7167-0344-0

# This page was last modified on 30 October 2009 at 08:50.
# Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details.

— Wikipedia on Gravitation (book)

2010.06.25 Friday ACHK